Total Commodity Programs in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 535
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 8th District of Minnesota (Rep. Pete Stauber) totaled $4,443,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jackson Farms Of Blackberry LLC | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $45,621 |
22 | Loren Barnick | Mora, MN 55051 | $42,045 |
23 | Matthew Merrick | Pine City, MN 55063 | $41,951 |
24 | David Karas | Pine City, MN 55063 | $41,472 |
25 | Home Place Dairy LLC | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $37,000 |
26 | Roger A Nelson | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $35,887 |
27 | Daily Bread Custom Farming Inc | Mora, MN 55051 | $35,569 |
28 | Matthew Brink | Deer River, MN 56636 | $35,556 |
29 | Richard Brink | Deer River, MN 56636 | $35,174 |
30 | Harris Dairy Inc | Sandstone, MN 55072 | $34,483 |
31 | Fredrick L Ten Cate | Ogilvie, MN 56358 | $34,413 |
32 | Mcvay Land Co Dba Mcvay Farms | Minnetonka, MN 55345 | $33,870 |
33 | Howard D Swanson | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $32,679 |
34 | Kevin Mathison | Mora, MN 55051 | $32,313 |
35 | Theodore Kraft | Pine City, MN 55063 | $32,178 |
36 | Scott Lucht | Braham, MN 55006 | $31,158 |
37 | Donald R Thoeny | Ogilvie, MN 56358 | $30,021 |
38 | Michael Funnell | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $29,643 |
39 | Daryl W Voss | Mora, MN 55051 | $29,387 |
40 | Thunderbrook Beef Ranch | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $28,966 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”