Production Flexibility Program in 3rd District of Missouri (Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,239

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 3rd District of Missouri (Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer) totaled $9,334,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
141Donald HeggemannMarthasville, MO 63357$17,643
142Carl David TroesserBonnots Mill, MO 65016$17,336
143Schneider Family TrustWarrenton, MO 63383$17,323
144Norman A TroesserBonnots Mill, MO 65016$17,282
145Leo SommerWarrenton, MO 63383$17,262
146Eugene HaarmannWarrenton, MO 63383$17,005
147Lyonel R Schweerkotting Living TrHermann, MO 65041$16,972
148Glen Alan HennekeLinn, MO 65051$16,899
149Alvin H Juergensmeyer Revoc LivinWarrenton, MO 63383$16,693
150Ralph J And Rose C Orf Rvoc Living Tr 04051995Wentzville, MO 63385$16,680
151Robert F SundermeyerChamois, MO 65024$16,550
152Dennis J BradyWarrenton, MO 63383$16,298
153Arthur M ViehmannWentzville, MO 63385$16,143
154Leon G Hellebusch-hellebusch Joint Revocable TrustMarthasville, MO 63357$15,766
155Arden H EngelageWarrenton, MO 63383$15,739
156Rush Island FarmsHermann, MO 65041$15,730
157Ralph BerhorstFreeburg, MO 65035$15,252
158Tom R CarterWarrenton, MO 63383$15,147
159Kent Albert KuschelChamois, MO 65024$15,058
160Ed HollenbeckWright City, MO 63390$14,930

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag