Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 122
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler) totaled $870,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alan E Nieder | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $5,050 |
42 | Richard Wayne & Annette K Sells L | Columbia, MO 65201 | $4,970 |
43 | Robert Mcquitty | Chilhowee, MO 64733 | $4,839 |
44 | Wayne Jeans | Richards, MO 64778 | $4,563 |
45 | Jeffrey Elvis Nelson | Lacygne, KS 66040 | $4,405 |
46 | Larry Joe Harms | Windsor, MO 65360 | $4,181 |
47 | Wesley R Nieder | Amsterdam, MO 64723 | $4,148 |
48 | Jbl Farms Inc | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $4,138 |
49 | James Brian Cox | Butler, MO 64730 | $4,012 |
50 | Donald Ray Dirks | Walker, MO 64790 | $3,892 |
51 | Terry Koehn | Nevada, MO 64772 | $3,892 |
52 | Darryl Mac Harms | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $3,616 |
53 | Milburn Marcus Harms | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $3,611 |
54 | Midland Land & Cattle Co Inc | Lenexa, KS 66215 | $3,587 |
55 | Joseph Ward Claypool | Richards, MO 64778 | $3,544 |
56 | Dan Hutchinson | Urbana, MO 65767 | $3,500 |
57 | Harned Farms Inc | Columbia, MO 65203 | $3,500 |
58 | Cooper County Cattle Company | Boonville, MO 65233 | $3,500 |
59 | Ray Knott | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $3,500 |
60 | Francile Stanfill | Amoret, MO 64722 | $3,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”