Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 152

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler) totaled $4,167,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
81Charles L GarrisonLincoln, MO 65338$11,133
82Aaron V WessingPilot Grove, MO 65276$10,667
83Daniel J KliethermesColumbia, MO 65203$10,571
84Mark PethanBunceton, MO 65237$10,555
85Lisa Pethan-hahmMesquite, NV 89027$10,248
86Michael PethanIndependence, MO 64055$10,248
87Anita Helmreich Revocable TrustBoonville, MO 65233$9,978
88Saathoff FarmsAdrian, MO 64720$9,566
89Harold HoflanderHigginsville, MO 64037$9,291
90Jeanette Ann EsserBlackwater, MO 65322$8,507
91Robert-james LathropEnumclaw, WA 98022$8,378
92Austin David KliethermesCalifornia, MO 65018$8,316
93Denise GibsonTorrance, CA 90505$7,973
94Joni HenscheTehachapi, CA 93561$7,973
95Richard BorgmannBoonville, MO 65233$7,712
96Timothy J KueckelhanBoonville, MO 65233$7,313
97Willard B Avery Revocable TrustColumbia, MO 65203$7,279
98Paul BerwangerBoonville, MO 65233$7,250
99Charles E & Janet L Scheidt Revocable TrustColumbia, MO 65203$7,250
100Dorothy WielandBunceton, MO 65237$7,088

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag