Counter Cyclical Program in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,895
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler) totaled $9,643,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Phillip Evan Stevener | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $18,862 |
82 | Myron Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $18,597 |
83 | John Ellebracht Revocable Trust, Dated December 19 | Pilot Grove, MO 65276 | $18,578 |
84 | Grissum Brothers Lc | Boonville, MO 65233 | $18,294 |
85 | Devern Ray Koehn | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $18,289 |
86 | Wade Rapp | Schell City, MO 64783 | $18,226 |
87 | Wainscott Farms | Butler, MO 64730 | $17,999 |
88 | Mark Edwin Nelson | Amoret, MO 64722 | $17,958 |
89 | James William Robinson | Butler, MO 64730 | $17,935 |
90 | Herb Brownsberger | Butler, MO 64730 | $17,897 |
91 | Michelle Lynn Brownsberger | Butler, MO 64730 | $17,896 |
92 | Gary Dean Steuck | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $17,816 |
93 | Bryan Dehn | Clinton, MO 64735 | $17,577 |
94 | Darrel E Tenholder | Adrian, MO 64720 | $17,340 |
95 | J & S Farms | Clinton, MO 64735 | $17,284 |
96 | Martin Levi Ghere | Butler, MO 64730 | $16,968 |
97 | Jim Tenholder | Butler, MO 64730 | $16,914 |
98 | Saathoff Farms | Adrian, MO 64720 | $16,897 |
99 | Hamilton Brothers Cattle | Windsor, MO 65360 | $16,712 |
100 | Paul Salmon | Creighton, MO 64739 | $16,703 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”