Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,159
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler) totaled $5,348,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Terry H Mitchel | Clinton, MO 64735 | $9,092 |
102 | Harley K Page | Butler, MO 64730 | $9,049 |
103 | Mark Hutchinson | Chilhowee, MO 64733 | $8,996 |
104 | Jeffrey D Greer | Nevada, MO 64772 | $8,911 |
105 | Doug Gayman | Schell City, MO 64783 | $8,881 |
106 | Alpers Bros Farms Inc | Prairie Home, MO 65068 | $8,866 |
107 | Sheree L Eckhoff | Lincoln, MO 65338 | $8,857 |
108 | Tracy M Burns | Butler, MO 64730 | $8,825 |
109 | Donald J Esser | Blackwater, MO 65322 | $8,738 |
110 | Mitchells Sooner Ranch LLC | Clinton, MO 64735 | $8,653 |
111 | Robert J Brandes | Bunceton, MO 65237 | $8,631 |
112 | Ivan D Fischer | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $8,588 |
113 | Christopher Smith | Urich, MO 64788 | $8,506 |
114 | Saathoff Farms | Adrian, MO 64720 | $8,480 |
115 | Westerhold Cattle LLC | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $8,384 |
116 | Daniel Martin Wainscott | Butler, MO 64730 | $8,329 |
117 | Jeremy Zoglmann | Milo, MO 64767 | $8,304 |
118 | Dalton Mcelwain | Butler, MO 64730 | $8,266 |
119 | Jayme N Mcelwain | Butler, MO 64730 | $8,266 |
120 | Dirk Elliott Diehl | Butler, MO 64730 | $8,210 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”