Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 534
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler) totaled $1,636,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Larry V Barnett | Urich, MO 64788 | $3,313 |
142 | Hoff Farms Inc | Boonville, MO 65233 | $3,276 |
143 | , | $3,247 | |
144 | Angelena L Orear | Hume, MO 64752 | $3,245 |
145 | , | $3,232 | |
146 | Lorine M Feldmann | Nevada, MO 64772 | $3,230 |
147 | Donald Knedgen | Pilot Grove, MO 65276 | $3,230 |
148 | Frederick Feldmann | Nevada, MO 64772 | $3,230 |
149 | Jerry W & Louise E Gerling Common Trust | Pilot Grove, MO 65276 | $3,206 |
150 | John G Jewett Revocable Trust | Boonville, MO 65233 | $3,198 |
151 | Ha Nixon Farm LLC | Wooldridge, MO 65287 | $3,192 |
152 | Daniel Deems | Blue Springs, MO 64013 | $3,149 |
153 | Zachary N Hilty | Bethany, MO 64424 | $3,127 |
154 | South Fork II LLC | Lenexa, KS 66220 | $3,091 |
155 | Paul N Ross And Georgia C Ross Revocable Trust | Urich, MO 64788 | $3,088 |
156 | Allen W Hilbus | Butler, MO 64730 | $3,088 |
157 | Kenneth P Lehman | California, MO 65018 | $3,084 |
158 | Karen L Watts | Butler, MO 64730 | $3,071 |
159 | Eugene J Putthoff | Belton, MO 64012 | $3,057 |
160 | Kenneth Radmacher | Pleasant Hill, MO 64080 | $3,053 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”