Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,696

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler) totaled $127,145,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
21Larry ConradClinton, MO 64735$464,882
22Sylvester TwenterLiberty, MO 64068$456,096
23James L GuthrieNevada, MO 64772$452,115
24Pearson Land & Cattle Co LLCKansas City, MO 64111$443,842
25Robert Pennock Rev TrustEl Dorado Springs, MO 64744$426,404
26Barbara Pipes TrustGainesville, TX 76240$419,691
27Doris ViertelBoonville, MO 65233$415,709
28Jerry W Burch TrustWalker, MO 64790$411,277
29Dody Farms IncClinton, MO 64735$411,250
30Wade RappSchell City, MO 64783$404,885
31R Wayne & Mildred L Blevins TrustIndependence, MO 64055$395,280
32Mayfield Farms IncBunceton, MO 65237$392,836
33Millard Cook TrustOsceola, MO 64776$381,773
34Don K Bail Revocable TrustBoonville, MO 65233$380,048
35Hilty Family Limited PartnershipClinton, MO 64735$375,639
36Brumback Farms IncBunceton, MO 65237$375,211
37Patricia Lynne MichelleNevada, MO 64772$358,797
38Wanda QuickMckinney, TX 75071$358,413
39James E Felgar Revocable TrustBunceton, MO 65237$355,472
40Glenn E ReynoldsMabank, TX 75147$349,274

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag