Total Conservation Programs in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 4,115

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 4th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler) totaled $130,500,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
61Akeman Family TrustMarshall, MO 65340$295,280
62Marianne Cole-fuesColumbia, MO 65203$294,618
63Nancy Cole-crawfordOsage Beach, MO 65065$294,617
64Alan Cox Farms IncButler, MO 64730$291,329
65Maurice Garnant Rev TrustCedar Rapids, IA 52404$290,463
66Francile StanfillAmoret, MO 64722$290,437
67Jerry MorrisDeerfield, MO 64741$289,376
68The Family Trust Of Robert H Hodge & Louise S HodgCollege Station, TX 77845$289,071
69Paul N Ross And Georgia C Ross Revocable TrustUrich, MO 64788$284,396
70David Ward WeaverLiberal, MO 64762$283,267
71W J StewardNevada, MO 64772$277,646
72J Richard HarteWeatherby Lake, MO 64152$277,546
73Jerry NewkirkBunceton, MO 65237$273,774
74Valorie WorsleyFort Scott, KS 66701$273,712
75Edward E PostBronaugh, MO 64728$272,626
76Lucky & Ruth Simpson TrustNorton, KS 67654$270,303
77Genieveve R FriedrichBelleville, IL 62220$267,946
78Don BullockWindsor, MO 65360$267,587
79Allen L FinklangAdrian, MO 64720$264,991
80Kay W RockMadison, WI 53726$261,342

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag