Conservation Reserve Program in 6th District of Missouri (Rep. Sam Graves), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 8,189
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 6th District of Missouri (Rep. Sam Graves) totaled $67,219,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Larry Menke Revocable Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $46,047 |
102 | Victor Gladbach | Marceline, MO 64658 | $46,030 |
103 | Frances E Walton Revocable Trust | Savannah, MO 64485 | $45,827 |
104 | Leanna Ohnmacht | Blanchard, IA 51630 | $45,822 |
105 | Willard D Darby | Bethany, MO 64424 | $45,701 |
106 | David Lee Garland | Darlington, MO 64438 | $45,675 |
107 | Douglas Peery Doughty | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $45,665 |
108 | Sue Sexton | Maysville, MO 64469 | $45,592 |
109 | James Faris Walker III | Marietta, GA 30062 | $45,457 |
110 | C E Spainhower | Grant City, MO 64456 | $45,371 |
111 | Ward Sperry Inc | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $45,300 |
112 | Terry Owens | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $45,226 |
113 | , | $45,069 | |
114 | Dean D Mcdonald | Merrill, WI 54452 | $44,978 |
115 | John M Jeffries | Kearney, MO 64060 | $44,936 |
116 | Alisha Florence | Falls Church, VA 22041 | $44,703 |
117 | Wkk Land Group LLC | Lees Summit, MO 64086 | $44,424 |
118 | Roger Gene Eulinger & Kathey Mae Eulinger Rev Tr | Maysville, MO 64469 | $44,267 |
119 | Davis M Burrus | Memphis, MO 63555 | $44,206 |
120 | East Fork Farms LLC | Saint Joseph, MO 64507 | $44,156 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”