Market Gains in 6th District of Missouri (Rep. Sam Graves), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,712
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 6th District of Missouri (Rep. Sam Graves) totaled $44,788,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gebhardt Farms Inc | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $79,058 |
102 | Mino Farms Inc | Harris, MO 64645 | $78,985 |
103 | Triplett Brothers Farms, L.l.c. | Rutledge, MO 63563 | $77,198 |
104 | James William Strong | Knox City, MO 63446 | $76,668 |
105 | Randall Lee Graeff | Osborn, MO 64474 | $76,092 |
106 | Thomas Owen Cain | Oregon, MO 64473 | $75,875 |
107 | Phillip Eugene Aylward | Memphis, MO 63555 | $75,607 |
108 | Kent Dorvis Harmon | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $74,563 |
109 | Michael Finnell | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $73,813 |
110 | William Herbert Nease | Savannah, MO 64485 | $73,505 |
111 | Keith Logsdon | La Grange, MO 63448 | $73,473 |
112 | Biermann Farms Inc | Craig, MO 64437 | $73,027 |
113 | Timothy L Umbarger | Fairfax, MO 64446 | $72,419 |
114 | David Harris Myers | Memphis, MO 63555 | $72,020 |
115 | Ronald Wayne Wilson | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $71,855 |
116 | Payton Farms Inc | Platte City, MO 64079 | $71,722 |
117 | Michael Shawn Rolf | Westboro, MO 64498 | $71,688 |
118 | Yolanda Louise Erickson | Tarkio, MO 64491 | $71,674 |
119 | David Eugene Meyerkorth | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $70,498 |
120 | Daniel E Luke | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $70,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”