Farm Subsidy information
6th District of Missouri
(Rep. Sam Graves)
Total Subsidies in 6th District of Missouri (Rep. Sam Graves), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 19,038
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 6th District of Missouri (Rep. Sam Graves) totaled $182,024,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mcbee Family Farms | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $1,106,199 |
2 | Griffin Farms | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $876,672 |
3 | Dale Farming Company | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $456,062 |
4 | M Epperson Farms LLC | Laredo, MO 64652 | $397,601 |
5 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $388,455 |
6 | Wayne Johnson Farms | Spickard, MO 64679 | $366,246 |
7 | G.t. Luttrull, Incorporated | Lewistown, MO 63452 | $343,838 |
8 | Meinke Farms | Princeton, MO 64673 | $341,116 |
9 | Binder Agventure | Craig, MO 64437 | $340,563 |
10 | Poe Farms LLC | Downing, MO 63536 | $326,889 |
11 | Michael M Keefhaver | Edgerton, MO 64444 | $315,819 |
12 | Pilot Grove Savings Bank ** | Canton, MO 63435 | $298,125 |
13 | Harold Martin | Watson, MO 64496 | $291,684 |
14 | Whan Farms Inc | Lewistown, MO 63452 | $280,372 |
15 | Siddens Farms | Albany, MO 64402 | $278,314 |
16 | Bunker Farms Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $257,673 |
17 | Bl Luttrull Inc | Lewistown, MO 63452 | $253,347 |
18 | Fcs Financial ** | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $244,014 |
19 | Mcbee Farms Lc | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $241,121 |
20 | Klocke Farms LLC | Maywood, MO 63454 | $238,922 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>