Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in 6th District of Missouri (Rep. Sam Graves), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 10,827
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in 6th District of Missouri (Rep. Sam Graves) totaled $25,668,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mccrea Farms Inc | Maysville, MO 64469 | $30,399 |
22 | Lance Roy Strong | Maysville, MO 64469 | $29,617 |
23 | Todd Thacker | Maryville, MO 64468 | $29,523 |
24 | Stephen Eiberger | King City, MO 64463 | $29,224 |
25 | Buckner Farms | Humphreys, MO 64646 | $28,224 |
26 | Ronald Murray | New Hampton, MO 64471 | $28,208 |
27 | Curtis Giddens | Agency, MO 64401 | $27,006 |
28 | Zane L Klein | Harris, MO 64645 | $26,560 |
29 | Tony Mckenney | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $26,500 |
30 | Leeser Farms Inc | Taylor, MO 63471 | $26,406 |
31 | Allen D Powell Revocable Trust | Laclede, MO 64651 | $26,023 |
32 | Stanton W Grotenhuis | Green City, MO 63545 | $25,914 |
33 | Louis Lutz Inc | Powersville, MO 64672 | $25,790 |
34 | James R Pfeiff | Purdin, MO 64674 | $25,507 |
35 | Walnut Valley Farms | Unionville, MO 63565 | $24,607 |
36 | Rodney Dollars | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $24,475 |
37 | Bryce L Tallman | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $24,405 |
38 | Bobby Ray Richardson | Pollock, MO 63560 | $24,386 |
39 | Kevin Strange | Edina, MO 63537 | $24,066 |
40 | Phillip E Peery | Darlington, MO 64438 | $24,062 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”