Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 7th District of Missouri (Rep. Billy Long), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,676
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 7th District of Missouri (Rep. Billy Long) totaled $13,196,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Charles Mitchell | Seligman, MO 65745 | $29,173 |
62 | Weaver Forest | Verona, MO 65769 | $28,818 |
63 | Kenneth Elbert | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $28,626 |
64 | Stanley Scott Sanders | Stella, MO 64867 | $28,603 |
65 | A & W Brooks Farms LLC | Exeter, MO 65647 | $27,969 |
66 | Cw Family Farms, Inc | Anderson, MO 64831 | $27,852 |
67 | Ricky J Miller | Spokane, MO 65754 | $27,205 |
68 | Richard M Olbrey | Neosho, MO 64850 | $27,155 |
69 | Jason A Oneill | Cassville, MO 65625 | $27,132 |
70 | Dean L Tucker | Verona, MO 65769 | $26,811 |
71 | Dylan Lane Burns | Purdy, MO 65734 | $26,649 |
72 | , | $26,649 | |
73 | James Rantz | Spokane, MO 65754 | $26,225 |
74 | Nick Neece | Neosho, MO 64850 | $26,223 |
75 | Gloria J Wilson | Wheaton, MO 64874 | $26,064 |
76 | Clint D Blankenship | Aurora, MO 65605 | $25,887 |
77 | Randy L Gorman | Stark City, MO 64866 | $25,755 |
78 | Joan Martin | Neosho, MO 64850 | $25,635 |
79 | Bill G Thogmartin Jr | Neosho, MO 64850 | $25,472 |
80 | Thomas W Wiechman | Pea Ridge, AR 72751 | $25,472 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”