Farm Subsidy information
7th District of Missouri
(Rep. Billy Long)
Total Subsidies in 7th District of Missouri (Rep. Billy Long), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 7,644
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 7th District of Missouri (Rep. Billy Long) totaled $149,506,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Keith B Daniels | Neosho, MO 64850 | $223,626 |
82 | Jerome Falls | Granby, MO 64844 | $223,268 |
83 | Francis Washick | Purdy, MO 65734 | $223,147 |
84 | James Rantz | Spokane, MO 65754 | $223,049 |
85 | Creekside Dairy LLC | Fairview, MO 64842 | $222,677 |
86 | Gregory G Wilson | Neosho, MO 64850 | $221,750 |
87 | Rex Henderson | Purdy, MO 65734 | $218,739 |
88 | Melvin Priest | Purdy, MO 65734 | $218,377 |
89 | Christopher T Keeling | Purdy, MO 65734 | $217,536 |
90 | Murry Renner | Granby, MO 64844 | $212,912 |
91 | Steve Stone | Galena, MO 65656 | $209,544 |
92 | Hilltop Dairy | Monett, MO 65708 | $207,630 |
93 | Lewis Wayne Gugel | Billings, MO 65610 | $205,447 |
94 | Randy L Gorman | Stark City, MO 64866 | $203,650 |
95 | Michael K Glossip | Crane, MO 65633 | $201,418 |
96 | Mike Meier | Monett, MO 65708 | $200,378 |
97 | Mark Tichenor | Wheaton, MO 64874 | $200,014 |
98 | Larry Pearman | Neosho, MO 64850 | $198,176 |
99 | Larry Harris | Stark City, MO 64866 | $195,327 |
100 | Kevin Peebles | Clever, MO 65631 | $195,211 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”