Emergency Conservation Program in 7th District of Missouri (Rep. Billy Long), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 963
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in 7th District of Missouri (Rep. Billy Long) totaled $5,011,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Allison Haskins | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $23,588 |
22 | Gregory G Wilson | Neosho, MO 64850 | $23,271 |
23 | James Mcalester | Seneca, MO 64865 | $22,794 |
24 | Fred Chapman | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $21,432 |
25 | Wilson Brothers Inc | Anderson, MO 64831 | $21,044 |
26 | Parish Partnership | Noel, MO 64854 | $20,952 |
27 | John C Adams | Southwest City, MO 64863 | $20,904 |
28 | Freda Bernadine Sprenkle | Granby, MO 64844 | $20,869 |
29 | Janet Winchester | Neosho, MO 64850 | $20,603 |
30 | Arnaud Farms | Monett, MO 65708 | $20,359 |
31 | Frye Family Enterprise Lp | Seneca, MO 64865 | $19,965 |
32 | Gary Fields | Cassville, MO 65625 | $19,709 |
33 | Mike Carr | Cassville, MO 65625 | $19,487 |
34 | Charles Stults | Purdy, MO 65734 | $19,436 |
35 | Zandall Reynolds | Neosho, MO 64850 | $19,315 |
36 | Herbert Reynolds | Neosho, MO 64850 | $19,309 |
37 | Fred G Gates | Seneca, MO 64865 | $19,290 |
38 | Chapman Dairy Inc | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $18,574 |
39 | Robert Joseph Rakoski | Monett, MO 65708 | $18,357 |
40 | Charles F Beaty Jr | Purdy, MO 65734 | $18,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”