Production Flexibility Program in 7th District of Missouri (Rep. Billy Long), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 691
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 7th District of Missouri (Rep. Billy Long) totaled $3,250,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul W Heidlage | Wentworth, MO 64873 | $29,098 |
22 | Tichenor Drilling Inc | Wheaton, MO 64874 | $27,620 |
23 | C A Wagner | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $25,808 |
24 | Delmar G Hunke Living Trust | Stark City, MO 64866 | $25,656 |
25 | Jared W Hunke | Summerland Key, FL 33042 | $25,361 |
26 | Danny Bartkoski | Pierce City, MO 65723 | $23,830 |
27 | Christa Hallett | Springfield, MO 65807 | $23,375 |
28 | Leonard C Montgomery | Fairview, MO 64842 | $22,605 |
29 | Ketcham Ranch | Neosho, MO 64850 | $22,604 |
30 | Robert L Foster | Neosho, MO 64850 | $22,515 |
31 | Alan L Loehr | Seneca, MO 64865 | $22,436 |
32 | Harris & Hunke | Stark City, MO 64866 | $21,967 |
33 | Jay Lee Renner | Neosho, MO 64850 | $20,846 |
34 | Arthur C Petty Jr | Diamond, MO 64840 | $20,682 |
35 | Donald L Greer | Fairview, MO 64842 | $19,849 |
36 | Don Brown | Neosho, MO 64850 | $19,800 |
37 | Hersey Equipment Inc | Granby, MO 64844 | $19,037 |
38 | Carpenter Farms | Stark City, MO 64866 | $18,760 |
39 | J D Mcbride | Stark City, MO 64866 | $17,731 |
40 | Richard Harp | Diamond, MO 64840 | $17,679 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”