Farm Subsidy information
8th District of Missouri
(Rep. Jason Smith)
Total Subsidies in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 6,292
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $42,150,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dsa Farms Gp | Clarkton, MO 63837 | $136,330 |
22 | Gary D Murphy II Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $134,322 |
23 | Ryan Brandon Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $132,484 |
24 | , | $129,295 | |
25 | Sprigg Street Dairy LLC | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $128,244 |
26 | Daniels Farm Partnership | Hornersville, MO 63855 | $127,287 |
27 | Willow & Co | Bell City, MO 63735 | $126,972 |
28 | Stacy Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $126,071 |
29 | Hoggard Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $125,557 |
30 | Trey Lawfield Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $124,796 |
31 | Jarrett Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $124,774 |
32 | Michael A Tidwell | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $122,149 |
33 | Patrick Hulshof Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $121,085 |
34 | Clark Ag Company | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $119,910 |
35 | Donnie Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $119,321 |
36 | Grm Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $118,675 |
37 | Castor River Farming Co | Dexter, MO 63841 | $114,215 |
38 | Jon & Deidre Thompson | Dexter, MO 63841 | $113,640 |
39 | Greg Tharp | Naylor, MO 63953 | $111,585 |
40 | Cef Farms LLC | Dexter, MO 63841 | $110,995 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”