Total Conservation Programs in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 5,494

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $132,911,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
41Riche La Terre Land Partnership L PSikeston, MO 63801$313,519
42Gerald GriffinBloomfield, MO 63825$313,352
43Bonnie Louise JohnsAdvance, MO 63730$310,040
44William - William Cl Clay RileyJackson, MO 63755$307,178
45Terry Lee GriffinAdvance, MO 63730$299,858
46Stanley C Flowers Revocable TrustDexter, MO 63841$298,414
47J Handy Moore Revocable TrustSikeston, MO 63801$291,641
48Andrew HeckemeyerSikeston, MO 63801$287,711
49Joe HeckemeyerSikeston, MO 63801$287,032
50Earl BullingtonCaruthersville, MO 63830$281,868
51Matt HeckemeyerSikeston, MO 63801$277,074
52Sisters Island PartnershipGermantown, TN 38138$276,233
53Jbs Farms IncCharleston, MO 63834$275,227
54Fox Meadows IncCharleston, MO 63834$274,624
55Wayne FronabargerOak Ridge, MO 63769$273,738
56Priggel Land PartnershipOran, MO 63771$273,614
57Gary D ReutzelAdvance, MO 63730$272,323
58Larry Gene Strobel IIOran, MO 63771$271,813
59Cooper Family Limited PartnershipDexter, MO 63841$266,075
60Penny Gail Baker Rev Liv TrustCampbell, MO 63933$264,650

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag