Total Conservation Programs in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,109
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $4,120,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Black River Ranch Management LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $15,172 |
42 | Duff Farm | Benton, MO 63736 | $14,740 |
43 | Gerald Griffin | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $14,700 |
44 | Truman J Lemons | Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 | $14,683 |
45 | W David Goodson And Jean Ann Goodson Revocable Liv | Jackson, MO 63755 | $14,641 |
46 | Richard A Martin Md Rev Tr - Richard A Martin Md | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $14,617 |
47 | James D Jernigan | Howey In The Hills, FL 34737 | $14,210 |
48 | Daphne J Jernigan | Howey In The Hills, FL 34737 | $14,210 |
49 | Lankheit Family Farms, Inc. | Charleston, MO 63834 | $13,823 |
50 | Tanksley Big Island Farms Lp | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $13,747 |
51 | Jan Mcferron | Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 | $13,407 |
52 | The North Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $13,363 |
53 | Randy Albert Enderle | Oran, MO 63771 | $13,269 |
54 | Elakco Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $13,137 |
55 | Triple D Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $13,032 |
56 | Gary D Reutzel | Advance, MO 63730 | $12,908 |
57 | Slusher Farms Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $12,881 |
58 | Cooper Quail Run, LLC | Farmington, MO 63640 | $12,722 |
59 | James Pollock Jr | Charleston, MO 63834 | $12,605 |
60 | Cheryl Bryant-bryant Living Trust | Rogersville, MO 65742 | $12,601 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”