Market Gains in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,830
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $77,774,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James W And M Kelley Corporation | Essex, MO 63846 | $194,399 |
62 | Rayburn Gene Wilson | Essex, MO 63846 | $192,825 |
63 | Larry Woolverton Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $191,410 |
64 | Walter Lee Strickland | Essex, MO 63846 | $191,028 |
65 | Joe Tucker | Kennett, MO 63857 | $190,725 |
66 | Luye Farms | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $190,590 |
67 | Bell Farms | Bell City, MO 63735 | $187,519 |
68 | Kevin Lee Still | Steele, MO 63877 | $186,714 |
69 | John David & Carolyn Morgan | Fisk, MO 63940 | $184,986 |
70 | Randol Williams | Kennett, MO 63857 | $184,793 |
71 | K & M Farms Inc | Dexter, MO 63841 | $184,193 |
72 | Joe Woolverton Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $184,154 |
73 | Billy & Curtis Aycock | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $182,309 |
74 | Odle Partnership Fms | Senath, MO 63876 | $181,139 |
75 | David Kelley Jr | Gamaliel, AR 72537 | $180,974 |
76 | King & Sons Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $180,913 |
77 | Dwight Blankenship | Gobler, MO 63849 | $180,692 |
78 | Kara Woods Still | Steele, MO 63877 | $179,392 |
79 | Triangle Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $178,971 |
80 | Stallings Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $178,309 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”