Total Commodity Programs in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 10,905
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $98,107,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | Triple Bg Partnership | Bell City, MO 63735 | $132,991 |
| 82 | Daniels Farm Partnership | Hornersville, MO 63855 | $131,560 |
| 83 | Jason E Cope Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $130,229 |
| 84 | Earl Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $129,419 |
| 85 | Sprigg Street Dairy LLC | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $127,745 |
| 86 | Seiler Farms Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $127,331 |
| 87 | Fowler Farms Inc | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $127,245 |
| 88 | Farm Credit Midsouth Pca ** | Barton, AR 72312 | $126,847 |
| 89 | Mcgarity Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $125,811 |
| 90 | Ling Farms LLC | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $125,520 |
| 91 | Michael & Cynthia Bell Farms | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $125,389 |
| 92 | Pascola Gin And Supply | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $124,964 |
| 93 | Mum Cattle Company | Scott City, MO 63780 | $124,789 |
| 94 | Parker Cotton Company Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $123,377 |
| 95 | Jessie Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $122,832 |
| 96 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $122,795 |
| 97 | Danny Wayne Parker | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $122,435 |
| 98 | Bottoms Farms Partnership | Dexter, MO 63841 | $122,354 |
| 99 | C & C Farms-chandler | Senath, MO 63876 | $122,043 |
| 100 | James Mark Kelley | Essex, MO 63846 | $121,796 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
