Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 3,164

Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $11,557,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Cotton Transistion Assistance Program
1995-2023
101Terry Scott Farms PartnershipGobler, MO 63849$24,076
102Mark E EllisPortageville, MO 63873$23,891
103Keith NashHolcomb, MO 63852$23,851
104Kevin Dewayne NashKennett, MO 63857$23,851
105Dandy Dean Dust Fms IncSenath, MO 63876$23,828
106Denny HaddockArbyrd, MO 63821$23,689
107William Barry AycockParma, MO 63870$23,623
1083- C FarmsBragg City, MO 63827$23,334
109Hoggard FarmsPortageville, MO 63873$23,184
110Gerald Woolverton Revocable LivinMalden, MO 63863$22,920
111Witt Smith Farms PartnershipBlytheville, AR 72315$22,902
112Dwight BlankenshipGobler, MO 63849$22,837
113Edward E Dement Farms IncSikeston, MO 63801$22,750
114Douglas Eugene MastersArbyrd, MO 63821$22,674
115James W And M Kelley CorporationEssex, MO 63846$22,533
116Allen Hampton FarmsDexter, MO 63841$22,490
117Steve Parker Farms LLCSikeston, MO 63801$22,396
118Wescoat HarvestingNew Madrid, MO 63869$22,263
119Joe F Priggel FarmsPortageville, MO 63873$22,233
120Delbert DepriestSteele, MO 63877$22,197

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag