Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 141
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $3,402,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Hulshof Farms | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $2,733 |
102 | Russell Burger | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $2,713 |
103 | Rone & Simpson Partnership | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,678 |
104 | Mcmullin Farms LLC | Ballwin, MO 63011 | $2,673 |
105 | Stephen Daume | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $2,668 |
106 | John P Dumey | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $2,629 |
107 | Robert Glueck | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $2,530 |
108 | Harold Glueck | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $2,529 |
109 | The Mcmullin Family Trust | Ballwin, MO 63011 | $2,445 |
110 | Dorothy Jansen | Oran, MO 63771 | $2,428 |
111 | Carol Gosche | Benton, MO 63736 | $2,424 |
112 | David L Jansen | Oran, MO 63771 | $2,420 |
113 | Timothy Michael Geske | Matthews, MO 63867 | $2,267 |
114 | Tamara L Gaines | Oran, MO 63771 | $2,189 |
115 | Deborah S Gaines | Oran, MO 63771 | $2,189 |
116 | Dorothy J Pope | Fountain Vly, CA 92708 | $2,156 |
117 | Glen A Griffin | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $2,067 |
118 | Beechy Brown Brazel | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $2,008 |
119 | Steven Dillard | Saint Mary, MO 63673 | $1,994 |
120 | Wesley Perry Dillard | Saint Mary, MO 63673 | $1,994 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”