Farm Subsidy information
8th District of Missouri
(Rep. Jason Smith)
Total Subsidies in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 37,332
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $3,466,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Wilber Bradford Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $2,467,210 |
142 | Carl Clifton Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $2,456,545 |
143 | Rick Branch Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $2,448,292 |
144 | Thompson Farms Ptr | Senath, MO 63876 | $2,447,356 |
145 | Earl Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $2,446,146 |
146 | Allen Hampton Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $2,436,012 |
147 | Marshall Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $2,420,961 |
148 | Wright Brothers Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $2,418,598 |
149 | Two B Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,416,944 |
150 | Pascola Gin And Supply | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $2,416,086 |
151 | Lmt Venture | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $2,415,142 |
152 | M & K Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $2,406,169 |
153 | Bader Farms Inc | Campbell, MO 63933 | $2,401,172 |
154 | James Raulerson | Holland, MO 63853 | $2,393,038 |
155 | Kevin Carlisle Farms | Lilbourn, MO 63862 | $2,380,685 |
156 | Clark Farm Enterprises | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $2,377,889 |
157 | Grape Ridge Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $2,369,540 |
158 | S & L Jackson Farm | Senath, MO 63876 | $2,368,693 |
159 | Steve Jones Farm | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $2,366,658 |
160 | J S P Farms | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $2,363,087 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”