Farm Subsidy information
8th District of Missouri
(Rep. Jason Smith)
Total Subsidies in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 9,279
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $297,883,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | J & M Priggel Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $835,351 |
| 22 | Joe Woolverton Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $815,697 |
| 23 | Parker & Jones Farms | Senath, MO 63876 | $794,425 |
| 24 | Layne Partnership | Arbyrd, MO 63821 | $793,417 |
| 25 | Storey Family Farms Arkansas LLC | Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 | $791,338 |
| 26 | Worrell Farms Partnership | Steele, MO 63877 | $790,154 |
| 27 | Barry L Richardson Jr Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $788,029 |
| 28 | Bean Farms Partnership | Holcomb, MO 63852 | $769,301 |
| 29 | T And J Farms | Braggadocio, MO 63826 | $735,206 |
| 30 | Michael & Cynthia Bell Farms | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $708,979 |
| 31 | L & G Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $704,728 |
| 32 | Willow & Co | Bell City, MO 63735 | $686,937 |
| 33 | First Commercial Bank ** | Benton, MO 63736 | $681,298 |
| 34 | Hayes Farm | Marston, MO 63866 | $673,207 |
| 35 | Burke Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $659,833 |
| 36 | R&r Farms | Clarkton, MO 63837 | $646,087 |
| 37 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $639,923 |
| 38 | Senath State Bank ** | Senath, MO 63876 | $624,038 |
| 39 | Keith Mayberry Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $621,726 |
| 40 | Donnie Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $611,503 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf