Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 141

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $3,402,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2021
21Stephen And Lori Watkins Farm PartnHayti, MO 63851$43,868
22Corse Company LlpCharleston, MO 63834$43,601
23Charles HeissererScott City, MO 63780$43,546
24Brazel FarmsCape Girardeau, MO 63701$42,665
25James T StreeteCaruthersville, MO 63830$39,446
26Douglas Arthur SchlosserOran, MO 63771$35,783
27John Robert GainesOran, MO 63771$32,540
28Joseph Andrew GainesOran, MO 63771$32,539
29Darwin A Rodewald Living TrustSaint Mary, MO 63673$28,776
30Elmer J SeyerOran, MO 63771$27,655
31Bartels Joint Rev TrustWhitewater, MO 63785$27,422
32Andy BryantCharleston, MO 63834$26,902
33Carl Joseph LandeweeChaffee, MO 63740$26,402
34Brazel Land & Timber LLCCharleston, MO 63834$25,584
35David George LangeChaffee, MO 63740$24,760
36Ricky Gene Jones Dba Rc FarmsKennett, MO 63857$23,496
37Morley LLCMatthews, MO 63867$22,634
38James D YountMillersville, MO 63766$21,906
39Donald HeissererScott City, MO 63780$21,767
40Dustin EssnerBenton, MO 63736$21,040

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag