Total Conservation Programs in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,109
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $4,120,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sarah Kathryn Heckemeyer | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $22,083 |
22 | Mary Elizabeth Heckemeyer | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $22,083 |
23 | Kohlfeld Farm Trust | Cape Girardeau, MO 63702 | $21,941 |
24 | Kelley & Pyle Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $21,672 |
25 | Dewitt Revocable Living Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $21,232 |
26 | Fbb Real Estate LLC | Bell City, MO 63735 | $21,216 |
27 | Jbs Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $21,043 |
28 | Sisters Island Partnership | Germantown, TN 38138 | $20,196 |
29 | Priggel Land Partnership | Oran, MO 63771 | $19,948 |
30 | Penny Gail Baker Rev Liv Trust | Campbell, MO 63933 | $19,375 |
31 | Victor Delay | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $19,101 |
32 | Charles Siebert | Oran, MO 63771 | $18,087 |
33 | Byron Wright | Advance, MO 63730 | $18,043 |
34 | Bonnie Louise Johns | Advance, MO 63730 | $17,593 |
35 | Pierce Revocable Trust Uad March 3, 2016 | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $17,343 |
36 | Hubbert Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $17,104 |
37 | Stanley C Flowers Revocable Trust | Dexter, MO 63841 | $16,898 |
38 | L Burke Dodson - Burke And Cherie Dodson Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $16,593 |
39 | John Carleton Moreton | Charleston, MO 63834 | $16,490 |
40 | William Clay Riley - William Clay Riley Rev. Trust | Jackson, MO 63755 | $15,485 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”