Total Commodity Programs in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30,813

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $3,106,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Farm Credit Southeast Missouri **Poplar Bluff, MO 63901$26,048,683
2Missouri Delta FarmsSikeston, MO 63801$25,279,290
3Southern Bank **Sikeston, MO 63801$19,288,209
4Ddab FarmsCaruthersville, MO 63830$12,406,533
5Focus Bank **Charleston, MO 63834$12,064,519
6First State Bank And Trust Branch **Caruthersville, MO 63830$11,442,107
7Parker Brothers FarmSikeston, MO 63801$8,910,392
8First Missouri Bank Of Semo **Kennett, MO 63857$8,039,198
9Pierce FarmsCaruthersville, MO 63830$7,675,093
10Rone Farm PartnershipPortageville, MO 63873$7,573,080
11Parker & Jones FarmsSenath, MO 63876$7,431,976
12Pearson FarmsMatthews, MO 63867$7,086,340
13Clearview FarmsFisk, MO 63940$6,942,641
14Robinson FarmsDexter, MO 63841$6,563,526
15Priggel Land PartnershipOran, MO 63771$6,537,829
16Level Land FarmsBernie, MO 63822$6,514,734
17Hoggard FarmsPortageville, MO 63873$6,514,224
18Robinson BrosCooter, MO 63839$6,476,730
19Barry L Richardson Jr FarmsMarston, MO 63866$6,471,057
20Bank Of Missouri **Charleston, MO 63834$6,313,430

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag