Counter Cyclical Program in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,107
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly) totaled $62,531,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Scruggs Farms Joint Venture | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $1,615,034 |
2 | Bhf And Company | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $1,005,650 |
3 | Tucker Farming Co | Hamilton, MS 39746 | $971,339 |
4 | West Farms | Caledonia, MS 39740 | $793,866 |
5 | Clifton Farms | Hernando, MS 38632 | $781,291 |
6 | T P Howard & Co | Lake Cormorant, MS 38641 | $727,066 |
7 | Mcclatchy And Sons | Red Banks, MS 38661 | $721,192 |
8 | Simpson & Simpson Farms | Ashland, MS 38603 | $620,826 |
9 | Kal-mac Farms | Olive Branch, MS 38654 | $573,662 |
10 | T E Swindoll & Co | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $546,081 |
11 | Bolden Brothers | Ashland, MS 38603 | $530,482 |
12 | Thompson Brothers | Hamilton, MS 39746 | $504,364 |
13 | Holloway Farms | Hamilton, MS 39746 | $485,544 |
14 | Campbell Farms | Baldwyn, MS 38824 | $473,498 |
15 | Robinson Farms | Hamilton, MS 39746 | $472,816 |
16 | Oneida Farms | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $457,986 |
17 | Carlisle Farms | Walls, MS 38680 | $444,552 |
18 | Swann Farms Partnership | Guntown, MS 38849 | $410,498 |
19 | Eaton Farms | Rienzi, MS 38865 | $395,286 |
20 | C & S Skelton Farms | Ashland, MS 38603 | $394,114 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>