Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Mississippi
(Rep. Trent Kelly)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,934
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly) totaled $19,597,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tedder Farms Inc | Houlka, MS 38850 | $94,818 |
22 | Little Thailand Farms II | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $93,426 |
23 | Keith Jantz | Okolona, MS 38860 | $91,770 |
24 | Lee Colby Pearson | Amory, MS 38821 | $91,721 |
25 | Mcfarling Farms Partnership | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $86,416 |
26 | Pure Harvest LLC | Houston, MS 38851 | $73,820 |
27 | Ltf III | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $73,350 |
28 | Jan D Hill | Woodland, MS 39776 | $70,616 |
29 | Jeremy Graham Dairy LLC | Thaxton, MS 38871 | $69,897 |
30 | Sidney Thomas Sanders | Hamilton, MS 39746 | $67,523 |
31 | 61 South Farms, LLC | Hernando, MS 38632 | $64,941 |
32 | Mississippi State University Foundation Inc | Collierville, TN 38027 | $63,062 |
33 | Brian Moss | Houston, MS 38851 | $61,771 |
34 | D And J Farms | Potts Camp, MS 38659 | $60,728 |
35 | Caleb Byrd | Lamar, MS 38642 | $60,597 |
36 | Raymond M Gallop | Aberdeen, MS 39730 | $59,491 |
37 | Joey W Childs | Ripley, MS 38663 | $58,140 |
38 | Brett Dendy | Houston, MS 38851 | $54,668 |
39 | Kal-mac Farms | Olive Branch, MS 38654 | $54,362 |
40 | Poverty Hill Farm | Okolona, MS 38860 | $52,428 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”