Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 803
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly) totaled $2,933,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rickman Farms | Corinth, MS 38834 | $15,156 |
22 | James H Hale | Olive Branch, MS 38654 | $15,095 |
23 | Tommy D Jones | Mantachie, MS 38855 | $14,985 |
24 | Geno Farms | Rienzi, MS 38865 | $14,197 |
25 | Wayvonne Spraggins | Mantachie, MS 38855 | $14,131 |
26 | Bobby S Hill | Woodland, MS 39776 | $13,970 |
27 | Bobby F Kirby | Mantee, MS 39751 | $13,970 |
28 | Johnny G Letson | Guntown, MS 38849 | $13,940 |
29 | Charlie Skelton | Ashland, MS 38603 | $13,565 |
30 | Joseph D Estess | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $13,545 |
31 | W D Fitts III | Byhalia, MS 38611 | $13,518 |
32 | John A Davis | Alachua, FL 32615 | $13,186 |
33 | Ben A Kitchens Insurance Trust | New Albany, MS 38652 | $12,936 |
34 | J D Frederick | Fulton, MS 38843 | $12,600 |
35 | D M Morris | Etta, MS 38627 | $12,322 |
36 | Jerry H Moore | Fulton, MS 38843 | $12,285 |
37 | Charles Chuck Lowry | Rienzi, MS 38865 | $12,197 |
38 | Bonnie Griffin | Baldwyn, MS 38824 | $12,089 |
39 | Jimmy W Collums | Houlka, MS 38850 | $12,049 |
40 | Joseph Ray | Olive Branch, MS 38654 | $12,005 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”