Total Conservation Programs in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,243
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly) totaled $5,742,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kevin - Kilgore Revocable L Trust Scott Kilgore | Houston, MS 38851 | $16,169 |
62 | Dan C Benefield | New Albany, MS 38652 | $15,616 |
63 | M & E Scruggs Family Properties LLC | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $15,498 |
64 | Hugh Short Farms LLC | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $15,430 |
65 | Wagner Enterprises Lp | Vestal, NY 13850 | $14,580 |
66 | Diane A Hawks | Washington, DC 20003 | $14,477 |
67 | Christopher C Koehn | Prairie, MS 39756 | $14,341 |
68 | Dan Sullivan | Okolona, MS 38860 | $14,052 |
69 | William L Rogers | Oxford, MS 38655 | $13,951 |
70 | Asa Watson Jr Irrevocable Trust | Aberdeen, MS 39730 | $13,815 |
71 | Ellis Properties L P | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $13,807 |
72 | Nelda M Anderson | Okolona, MS 38860 | $13,692 |
73 | Bowdre Emerson | Hernando, MS 38632 | $13,363 |
74 | Robert Lewis Smith Jr | Hernando, MS 38632 | $13,359 |
75 | Phil Scott Emerson Jr | Hernando, MS 38632 | $13,359 |
76 | Triple H Farms, LLC | Pontotoc, MS 38863 | $13,333 |
77 | , | $13,303 | |
78 | Lorie G Garner | New Albany, MS 38652 | $13,231 |
79 | James E Edens Iv | Okolona, MS 38860 | $13,195 |
80 | Terry Abby | Walnut, MS 38683 | $13,125 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”