Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 10,093

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly) totaled $208,716,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
101Wagner Enterprises LpVestal, NY 13850$246,594
102Tuscumbia River Bottom FarmsCorinth, MS 38835$246,164
103Alexander Farms LLCVardaman, MS 38878$244,655
104Buchanan Farms PtrBlue Mountain, MS 38610$241,544
105Alan C HurdleHolly Springs, MS 38635$240,916
106Thomas E MillenderAberdeen, MS 39730$238,714
107Bowdre EmersonHernando, MS 38632$238,410
108Robert Lewis Smith JrHernando, MS 38632$238,332
109Phil Scott Emerson JrHernando, MS 38632$238,332
110William B CoxArlington, TN 38002$237,737
111Edwin R Orr IIIPontotoc, MS 38863$234,988
112Donald L BunchAberdeen, MS 39730$234,128
113Casanova Real Estate Family Ltd PCleveland, MS 38732$233,754
114Heath BarnettHolly Springs, MS 38635$233,277
115Mississippi Hills LLCTupelo, MS 38804$233,090
116Jackson H WittjenHolly Springs, MS 38635$232,168
117F Stewart Kimmel Jr TrustGreenwood, MS 38935$232,052
118Mark F MercerEcru, MS 38841$231,703
119Fred T SmithAmory, MS 38821$231,126
120Montyne T SammonsCollierville, TN 38017$229,458

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag