Total Emergency Relief Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,106
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $66,635,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Delta Farms Partnership | Leland, MS 38756 | $780,104 |
2 | , | $717,487 | |
3 | Brazil Planting Company | Drew, MS 38737 | $711,912 |
4 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $699,252 |
5 | Bare Bones Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $671,413 |
6 | Delta Iv Farms | Finley, TN 38030 | $634,406 |
7 | Turner & Gee Farms | Como, MS 38619 | $610,888 |
8 | Flautt Farms | Webb, MS 38966 | $583,730 |
9 | Old Yocona River Planting Company | Marks, MS 38646 | $551,043 |
10 | M & P Planting | Sledge, MS 38670 | $522,448 |
11 | Citizens Bank & Trust Co ** | Marks, MS 38646 | $498,887 |
12 | Ray Crawford Farms | Lambert, MS 38643 | $495,160 |
13 | Canton Mart Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $482,960 |
14 | Delta Ag | Como, MS 38619 | $430,076 |
15 | Griffin Planting Company | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $424,595 |
16 | Shipland Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $408,521 |
17 | Hugh French Dba Pipe Dream Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $393,467 |
18 | , | $376,292 | |
19 | Prewitt Farms | Boyle, MS 38730 | $371,851 |
20 | Hughes Farms Partnership | Benoit, MS 38725 | $354,323 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>