Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,477
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $46,929,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Egypt Planting Company III | Cruger, MS 38924 | $184,267 |
22 | Little Omega Farms | Tchula, MS 39169 | $183,716 |
23 | Bcf-09 | Tunica, MS 38676 | $180,137 |
24 | Hard Cash Planting Company | Indianola, MS 38751 | $178,089 |
25 | Seward & Harris Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $170,649 |
26 | Deovelente Farms | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $168,594 |
27 | Bowdre Place | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $157,162 |
28 | Walter Pillow & Sons Planting Co | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $155,919 |
29 | Silent Shade Planting Company | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $155,772 |
30 | Heathman Planting Company | Indianola, MS 38751 | $153,191 |
31 | Makamson Planting Co | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $149,611 |
32 | Killebrew Cotton Co | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $149,455 |
33 | Jones Planting Company III | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $148,481 |
34 | Bond Farms Partnership | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $148,479 |
35 | Egremont-baconia Farms | Cary, MS 39054 | $147,548 |
36 | Ewing Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $146,065 |
37 | Ashley Selman Farms Partnership | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $145,467 |
38 | Lagniappe Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $145,012 |
39 | Cypress Brake Planting Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $144,673 |
40 | Vanlandingham Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $144,552 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”