Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,477

Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $46,929,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Cotton Transistion Assistance Program
1995-2023
21Egypt Planting Company IIICruger, MS 38924$184,267
22Little Omega FarmsTchula, MS 39169$183,716
23Bcf-09Tunica, MS 38676$180,137
24Hard Cash Planting CompanyIndianola, MS 38751$178,089
25Seward & Harris Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$170,649
26Deovelente FarmsBelzoni, MS 39038$168,594
27Bowdre PlaceRobinsonville, MS 38664$157,162
28Walter Pillow & Sons Planting CoGreenwood, MS 38930$155,919
29Silent Shade Planting CompanyBelzoni, MS 39038$155,772
30Heathman Planting CompanyIndianola, MS 38751$153,191
31Makamson Planting CoMorgan City, MS 38946$149,611
32Killebrew Cotton CoGreenwood, MS 38935$149,455
33Jones Planting Company IIIYazoo City, MS 39194$148,481
34Bond Farms PartnershipYazoo City, MS 39194$148,479
35Egremont-baconia FarmsCary, MS 39054$147,548
36Ewing Planting CompanyAnguilla, MS 38721$146,065
37Ashley Selman Farms PartnershipGreenwood, MS 38930$145,467
38Lagniappe Farms PartnershipCleveland, MS 38732$145,012
39Cypress Brake Planting CompanyTunica, MS 38676$144,673
40Vanlandingham FarmsLeland, MS 38756$144,552

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag