Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,441
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $27,194,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Battle Associates | Tunica, MS 38676 | $173,068 |
22 | Gypsy Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $168,498 |
23 | Maud Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $159,584 |
24 | Turner & Gee Farms | Como, MS 38619 | $154,246 |
25 | Rizzo Farms Joint Venture | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $152,532 |
26 | 3-rock Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $147,848 |
27 | Vetrano Farms | Rosedale, MS 38769 | $146,218 |
28 | The Bibb Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $143,492 |
29 | Perry Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $140,644 |
30 | Bryant Farms | Sledge, MS 38670 | $140,555 |
31 | J & D Planting | Sardis, MS 38666 | $133,454 |
32 | Reed Farms II | Batesville, MS 38606 | $132,756 |
33 | Cow Oak Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $124,811 |
34 | Mohead Planting Company | Lula, MS 38644 | $121,274 |
35 | E R Mcknight & Sons | Vicksburg, MS 39183 | $119,878 |
36 | Brad Tackett Farms | Sunflower, MS 38778 | $119,824 |
37 | Two Brooks Farm | Sumner, MS 38957 | $118,908 |
38 | Aguzzi Farms A Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $118,470 |
39 | Michael E Johnson & Son | Tunica, MS 38676 | $116,850 |
40 | Navillus Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $114,296 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”