Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 977
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $11,815,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Phillip Chisolm | Lexington, MS 39095 | $53,710 |
42 | Dixie Dairy Sales Stephen Armstrong | Vaiden, MS 39176 | $53,144 |
43 | Frank Nichols Farms | Benton, MS 39039 | $52,201 |
44 | , | $47,090 | |
45 | Mike Burell | Benton, MS 39039 | $45,415 |
46 | John Kinch Wilson | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $44,778 |
47 | Nolan H Oreilly III | Pickens, MS 39146 | $43,458 |
48 | Steve Coody | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $43,420 |
49 | Atley R Mabus | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $42,468 |
50 | Stacy D King | Bentonia, MS 39040 | $41,122 |
51 | David C Droge | Bentonia, MS 39040 | $40,376 |
52 | J Wayne Mcknight | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $38,541 |
53 | B & R Cattle Farm LLC | Flora, MS 39071 | $38,314 |
54 | Hart Foundation Farms Inc | Lexington, MS 39095 | $38,310 |
55 | Tyler Cannon Kirk | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $37,996 |
56 | Morgan Newton Kirk | Duck Hill, MS 38925 | $37,996 |
57 | Diana P Dyer | Benton, MS 39039 | $37,882 |
58 | William V Greer | Hermanville, MS 39086 | $37,704 |
59 | James R Greer | Hermanville, MS 39086 | $37,704 |
60 | Ronald S Muirhead | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $37,634 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”