Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 7,449

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $431,724,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
41Money Sunk PartnersYazoo City, MS 39194$784,819
42Sojamax IncJackson, MS 39236$781,673
43John H Pritchard JrMemphis, TN 38104$764,521
44Camille ThomasVicksburg, MS 39180$753,772
45Game IncRosedale, MS 38769$740,206
46Isaac W SayleCharleston, MS 38921$739,892
47X-bar Ranch IncTallulah, LA 71282$720,002
48Eddie ReynoldsCharleston, MS 38921$705,356
49Heigle Farms A PartnershipMayersville, MS 39113$704,875
50T B Henry & SonsVicksburg, MS 39183$703,042
51John & Mona Whitten Farm PartnersSumner, MS 38957$701,534
52Mike TurnerGreenwood, MS 38930$700,645
53Denny Paul FarmsYazoo City, MS 39194$694,681
54Purvis Grange Foundation Inc Dba Tara WildlifeVicksburg, MS 39183$693,694
55Spradling Brothers Farms, Inc.Marks, MS 38646$691,934
56Bryant ParrishLexington, MS 39095$683,713
57C D Long Investments Partners LpRosedale, MS 38769$677,868
58Robert And Mary Love Farm LLCBenton, MS 39039$676,867
59Galbreath Family Lmtd PartnshpNatchez, MS 39120$676,573
60Wilmont Wildlife PartnershipLeland, MS 38756$670,433

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag