Total Disaster Programs in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 7,648
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $336,399,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Caudell Farms Partnership | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $701,315 |
42 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $699,252 |
43 | Horseshoe Joint Venture | Tchula, MS 39169 | $694,484 |
44 | Colby Company III | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $687,154 |
45 | Citizens Bank & Trust Co ** | Marks, MS 38646 | $677,668 |
46 | Rogers B Morris | Mound Bayou, MS 38762 | $667,087 |
47 | Tim Morris Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $654,619 |
48 | , | $643,753 | |
49 | Kbs Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $642,655 |
50 | , | $635,337 | |
51 | J & L Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $632,903 |
52 | Moore Farms | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $631,458 |
53 | Hard Cash Planting Company | Indianola, MS 38751 | $629,972 |
54 | Myers Farm | Dundee, MS 38626 | $627,296 |
55 | Hargrave Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $626,925 |
56 | Bbf Partnership | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $623,475 |
57 | Michael E Johnson & Son | Tunica, MS 38676 | $602,165 |
58 | Canon Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $594,488 |
59 | Shipland Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $594,395 |
60 | O J Sharpe Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $592,464 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”