Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,040

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $9,663,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
41Fred A ChildsCherokee Vlg, AR 72529$34,076
42Fitts Fitts & Pate IvMoorhead, MS 38761$34,046
43Gregory L CarrSchlater, MS 38952$33,498
44Johnson Road Limited PartnershipMemphis, TN 38120$33,320
45Woods Brothers FarmsBenton, MS 39039$33,245
46Donald L TaylorJackson, TN 38302$32,839
47H L Merideth JrGulf Breeze, FL 32561$32,723
48Mrs Johnnie E WoffordEads, TN 38028$32,409
49P & J FarmsShelby, MS 38774$31,873
50Phillips FarmsHolly Bluff, MS 39088$31,531
51Gourlay Joint VentureRosedale, MS 38769$31,410
52Tricotn IIShaw, MS 38773$30,832
53James M GuestMinter City, MS 38944$30,768
54Circle H Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$30,275
55Tarver Farms PartnershipBoyle, MS 38730$30,240
56D D BrownVicksburg, MS 39180$30,000
57Upshaw Family PartnershipMemphis, TN 38120$30,000
58Goose Pond Ag IncSavoy, IL 61874$29,608
59Craigside Leasing CorporationGreenwood, MS 38930$28,986
60Douglas C MauldinCascilla, MS 38920$28,907

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag