Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,681

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $120,910,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
61Beaver Dam Planting CompanyTunica, MS 38676$260,685
62Capstone PartnersScott, MS 38772$260,145
63G & G Farms No 2Shaw, MS 38773$258,989
64Van Buren Farms IIBelzoni, MS 39038$257,866
65Fioranelli Brothers Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$256,869
66Egypt Planting Company IIICruger, MS 38924$255,288
67Passageway FarmsLyon, MS 38645$253,928
68Lagniappe Planting CompanyAnguilla, MS 38721$251,206
69Nipper Farms PartnershipRolling Fork, MS 39159$250,099
70Nature's Catch LLCClarksdale, MS 38614$250,000
71Us Catfish Farms LLCIsola, MS 38754$250,000
72America's Catch Catfish Farms IncItta Bena, MS 38941$250,000
73Donahoo Fish Farm LLCBelzoni, MS 39038$250,000
74Garry Makamson FarmsMorgan City, MS 38946$248,043
75Robertson PlantingIndianola, MS 38751$247,455
76Massey Planting CompanyLyon, MS 38645$246,858
77Wolf Lake FarmsLyon, MS 38645$245,998
78Double B FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$245,371
79Southern Planting CompanyGreenville, MS 38703$243,494
80Dixie FarmsVance, MS 38964$243,446

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag