Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 7,449

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $431,724,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
61James JenningsClarksdale, MS 38614$670,016
62Abydos Plantation Holdings LLCMadison, MS 39110$665,462
63Phillips Planting Company LLCYazoo City, MS 39194$663,164
64Forestaire EstatesVicksburg, MS 39181$656,585
65Paul FortnerSumner, MS 38957$656,128
66Graeber Gibbes And Pitts EnterprisesMarks, MS 38646$650,260
67Kinkead Plantation IncOcean Springs, MS 39564$646,521
68Beverly P JenkinsNatchez, MS 39120$642,790
69Leo Pittman EdwardsCleveland, MS 38732$642,515
70Bd Of Education Of Yazoo CoYazoo City, MS 39194$641,557
71Paula HowellSalem, AR 72576$638,559
72Kittle BrothersClarksdale, MS 38614$638,042
73Davis Island Land Company LLCAlexandria, LA 71302$636,644
74W Raiford HancockBentonia, MS 39040$635,328
75The Sledge Family Limited PartnerJackson, MS 39236$631,868
76Steele FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$620,405
77Link LpBentonia, MS 39040$619,760
78Egypt Planting Company IIICruger, MS 38924$619,358
79Hamaka Company LLCYazoo City, MS 39194$616,449
80Claude C JumonvilleVentress, LA 70783$610,218

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag