Miscellaneous Farm Programs in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,051
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $-79,039 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | A K Mills III | Delhi, LA 71232 | $247 |
82 | Moore Farms | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $247 |
83 | Seward & Harris Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $242 |
84 | Simmie Noel | Lexington, MS 39095 | $240 |
85 | Dean Dean & Dean | Panther Burn, MS 38765 | $232 |
86 | Day Place Farms | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $229 |
87 | Mcintyre Lake Inc | Jackson, MS 39225 | $227 |
88 | Wade Plantation | Marks, MS 38646 | $214 |
89 | Succession Of Mary P Sellars East | New Orleans, LA 70170 | $214 |
90 | Booker T Scott | Mound Bayou, MS 38762 | $211 |
91 | Humphrey Farms | Lexington, MS 39095 | $206 |
92 | Millenium Planting Company A Ms G | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $203 |
93 | Howard Brent | Greenville, MS 38702 | $199 |
94 | H W Howze Jr Estate | Sledge, MS 38670 | $195 |
95 | Delores W Howze Estate | Sledge, MS 38670 | $195 |
96 | Valley Park Plantation LLC | Vicksburg, MS 39181 | $190 |
97 | Valley Planting Company | Satartia, MS 39162 | $187 |
98 | T & S Farms | Satartia, MS 39162 | $180 |
99 | Rocconi Farms | Boyle, MS 38730 | $179 |
100 | David & Cynthia Shipp Partners | Benton, MS 39039 | $176 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”