Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 7,449

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $431,724,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
101Roger HancockBentonia, MS 39040$546,210
102Jackie DavisDundee, MS 38626$541,666
103Lou ParkerVicksburg, MS 39183$541,410
104Rushbrook Farms IncOxford, MS 38655$539,419
105Reece MakamsonMorgan City, MS 38946$537,318
106Gary MillsMemphis, TN 38104$537,124
107Richard LehmanWest, MS 39192$536,909
108Lynwood Otto DavidsonWest, MS 39192$535,172
109M C Ewing IIIAnguilla, MS 38721$533,840
110Palo Alto Plantation IncMinter City, MS 38944$531,795
111Valewood Plantation LLCRolling Fork, MS 39159$525,130
112Lowery Delta Development LLCMemphis, TN 38111$522,477
113Duncan Williams Farm IncMemphis, TN 38138$519,650
114William B MarcelloThibodaux, LA 70301$515,091
115Clinton G Rotenberry JrMendenhall, MS 39114$511,760
116Nick ChandlerSwiftown, MS 38959$508,038
117Big Four Management Services TrusBenoit, MS 38725$506,244
118Old Rivers Farm Of Mississippi LLCMemphis, TN 38125$504,594
119Estate Of John Legett Mcpherson SColumbus, MS 39701$501,983
120Billy James CalhounOak Grove, LA 71263$501,559

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag