Direct Payment Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 7,842

Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $1,073,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Direct Payment Program
1995-2023
101Twin Bayou FarmsMinter City, MS 38944$1,660,457
102Heathman Planting CompanyIndianola, MS 38751$1,654,421
103Bretlind Farms PartnersLeland, MS 38756$1,651,817
104Campbell Brothers Farm No 2Lyon, MS 38645$1,649,511
105Jtmp Rocconi Farms No 2Cleveland, MS 38732$1,611,352
106EurekaIndianola, MS 38751$1,606,260
107Passageway FarmsLyon, MS 38645$1,598,068
108H & H Farms No 2Benoit, MS 38725$1,595,525
109Aden FarmsValley Park, MS 39177$1,594,877
110Moon Lake FarmsClarksdale, MS 38614$1,585,633
111Thomas Farms PartnershipBatesville, MS 38606$1,578,789
112T E Swindoll & CoRobinsonville, MS 38664$1,577,912
113Horseshoe Joint VentureTchula, MS 39169$1,577,403
114Erickson Planting CompanyYazoo City, MS 39194$1,575,438
115Rkb Farms PartnershipRolling Fork, MS 39159$1,574,813
116Lubin Farms PartnershipDoddsville, MS 38736$1,574,749
117Hunter FarmsGlen Allan, MS 38744$1,574,039
118Bourbon PlantationLeland, MS 38756$1,569,495
119Grittman Farms Partnership IIRuleville, MS 38771$1,568,825
120Mosco Farms PartnershipCleveland, MS 38732$1,566,257

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag