Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,469
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $22,761,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Hill Place | Charleston, MS 38921 | $41,018 |
102 | Lowery Delta Development LLC | Memphis, TN 38111 | $40,797 |
103 | Fornea Farms LLC | Oxford, MS 38655 | $40,590 |
104 | Wilmont Wildlife Partnership | Leland, MS 38756 | $40,562 |
105 | Robert B Carter | Marks, MS 38646 | $40,556 |
106 | The Sledge Family Limited Partnership | Brandon, MS 39047 | $40,534 |
107 | Camille Thomas | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $40,253 |
108 | Delta Wildlife & Forestry Inc | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $39,994 |
109 | , | $39,937 | |
110 | , | $39,930 | |
111 | Sharp Place LLC | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $39,733 |
112 | Herbert Harris Lee Revocable Trust | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $39,629 |
113 | Leo Pittman Edwards | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $39,250 |
114 | , | $39,188 | |
115 | Kevin Sims | Batesville, MS 38606 | $39,170 |
116 | Forestdale Holding Company LLC | Madison, MS 39110 | $38,115 |
117 | A & P Farms Inc | Indianola, MS 38751 | $37,910 |
118 | Mcbride Farm & Outfitters LLC | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $37,766 |
119 | Davis Island Land Company LLC | Alexandria, LA 71302 | $37,504 |
120 | Hamaka Farms LLC | Jackson, MS 39215 | $37,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”