Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 7,449

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $431,724,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
121Virgil Rudolph Massey JrRussellville, AR 72802$497,880
122Kent-kent David Wadl D WadlingtonGermantown, TN 38138$496,525
123Carolyn C CobbMarks, MS 38646$495,733
124Julian B WatsonJackson, MS 39236$494,356
125Margie A McarthurSledge, MS 38670$493,064
126Bayou Boyz Farm LLCThibodaux, LA 70301$492,642
127Third Bridge Wildlife Plantation LLCGreenwood, MS 38930$490,803
128Raymond WilsonOlive Branch, MS 38654$490,427
129F W Mckay JrCanton, MS 39046$488,253
130Horseshoe Lake Farms LLCBaton Rouge, LA 70817$486,479
1313k Properties LLCOcean Springs, MS 39564$486,167
132Sarah RiceBentonia, MS 39040$484,361
133Frank GurleyMarks, MS 38646$483,824
134Ouachita Land LLCRolling Fork, MS 39159$482,978
135Third Bridge Farms IncHattiesburg, MS 39402$482,711
136Spradling Brothers PartnershipClarksdale, MS 38614$482,566
137Josephine P LoweDallas, TX 75248$482,532
138A & P Farms IncInverness, MS 38753$481,936
139James H MitchellMarks, MS 38646$481,634
140Samed Farms LLCNashville, TN 37204$478,629

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag