Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 7,449

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $431,724,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
161Allicat Farms IncAnguilla, MS 38721$444,620
162David Chris CrawfordLambert, MS 38643$442,794
163La Jolla Farms LLCMadison, MS 39110$442,694
164Hosemann Timber Company LLCJackson, MS 39211$442,327
165Sharp Place LLCYazoo City, MS 39194$441,186
166Melton Properties LLCGreenwood, MS 38935$441,120
167C L MillsDarling, MS 38623$440,740
168Harrison Brothers Land Company LLCLambert, MS 38643$440,181
169Wessie E GeeJackson, MS 39211$438,791
170Inger Kirsten WaerstadBelmont, MA 02478$438,746
171T R Mills JrSledge, MS 38670$436,699
172Linda G LehmanWest, MS 39192$432,905
173Dixie Dairy Sales Stephen ArmstrongVaiden, MS 39176$432,659
174Two Two Farms IncGermantown, TN 38138$432,549
175James Britt HerrinClarksdale, MS 38614$430,680
176Buck Ridge Timber Company LLCGreenwood, MS 38930$425,230
177Bowman Delta Farm LLCJackson, MS 39236$423,511
178William T BarnetteRolling Fork, MS 39159$421,620
179Hamberlin Farm IncHolly Springs, MS 38635$419,742
180Primos Business Dev LLCFlora, MS 39071$419,640

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag