Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,959

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $135,031,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
41White Farms AjvMarks, MS 38646$370,638
42Guaranty Bank & Trust Co **Belzoni, MS 39038$362,974
43Lagniappe Farms PartnershipCleveland, MS 38732$357,220
44C C & B FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$356,758
45Huddleston Planting CoGreenville, MS 38701$350,910
46Lakeland Planting CompanyHollandale, MS 38748$347,779
47Grace Ag PartnershipGreenville, MS 38703$345,951
48Sunshine Planting CompanyBrandon, MS 39043$342,357
49Morgan Planting Co PartnershipShaw, MS 38773$337,487
50Satterfield FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$336,357
51Aden FarmsValley Park, MS 39177$329,624
52Hunter Planting CoGrace, MS 38745$328,002
53Allendale Planting CoShelby, MS 38774$320,248
54Hard Cash Planting CompanyIndianola, MS 38751$317,704
55Bailey CompanyMadison, MS 39110$315,375
56Webb FarmsSumner, MS 38957$314,531
57Wolf Lake FarmsLyon, MS 38645$313,960
58Red Birds Farms PartnershipVicksburg, MS 39180$312,492
59Citizens Bank & Trust Co **Marks, MS 38646$312,111
60Esperanza Planting CoGlen Allan, MS 38744$311,801

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag